Relationship between contemporary pedagogical models and teacher curriculum planning at the Tsa'chila Higher Technological Institute

Main Article Content

Azalia del Cisne Capa Torre
Jimmy Vladimir Calderón Espinoza

Abstract

Curriculum planning in technological higher education constitutes the starting point for integrating contemporary pedagogical models that respond to current educational demands and promote student-centered teaching and learning processes. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between contemporary pedagogical models and curriculum planning in the Higher Technology Program in Accounting at the Tsa’chila Higher Technological Institute. The research adopted a mixed-methods approach with a descriptive-correlational scope, a non-experimental design, and a cross-sectional framework. The study population consisted of 25 faculty members, who completed a checklist designed to assess the incorporation of characteristics of contemporary pedagogical models into curriculum planning, as well as a structured questionnaire to examine their perceptions of these variables. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and Jamovi through descriptive statistics and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The results revealed a positive, moderate, and statistically significant relationship between contemporary pedagogical models and curriculum planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Capa Torre, A. del C., & Calderón Espinoza, J. V. (2026). Relationship between contemporary pedagogical models and teacher curriculum planning at the Tsa’chila Higher Technological Institute. Boletín Científico Ideas Y Voces, 6(3), Pág. 94–107. https://doi.org/10.60100/bciv.v6i3.324
Section
Articles

References

Allen, A. (2022). Una introducción al constructivismo: sus fundamentos teóricos e impacto en la educación contemporánea. Journal of Learning Design and Leadership, 1(1), 1–11.

Bautista, A., Wong, J., & Boone, W. (2023). Teorías contemporáneas del aprendizaje y aprendizaje activo en la educación superior. Journal of Educational Research, 116(2), 145–160.

Carrera, B., & Mazzarella, C. (2001). Vygotsky: enfoque sociocultural. Educere, 5(13), 41–44.

Castañeda-Sánchez, M. E., Vélez-Jiménez, D., & Chero Valdivieso, H. A. (2025). Tendencias en los modelos educativos universitarios: una revisión sistemática. PODIUM, (48), 1– 20. https://doi.org/10.31095/podium.2025.48.1298

Consejo de Educación Superior. (2022). Reglamento de Régimen Académico. https://www.ces.gob.ec/

Coşkun Yasar, G., & Aslan, B. (2021). Teoría curricular: un estudio de revisión. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 11(2), 237–260.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Díaz-Barriga, F., & Hernández, G. (2010). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo en América Latina. McGraw-Hill.

Espejo Leupin, R., Romo López, V., & Cárdenas, K. (2020). Desarrollo docente y diseño curricular en educación superior: una sinergia necesaria para mejorar la calidad de la educación. Estudios Pedagógicos, 46(2), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052020000200007

Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Conectivismo como teoría de aprendizaje: conceptos, ideas y posibles limitaciones. Educación y Tecnología, (1), 111–122.

Hernández Sampieri, R. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.