Reading processes among elementary school students in Quito: an assessment using the PROLEC-R battery

Main Article Content

Ketty Tatiana Sisalima Angamarca
Paulina Aracely Salguero Espinosa
Alirio Antonio Mejía Marín

Abstract

In the Ecuadorian education system, approximately two-thirds of students do not meet the minimum standards for reading skills. This study assesses these skills among 12- and 13-year-old students at a school in Quito. A quantitative methodology was employed, using a non-experimental, cross-sectional, descriptive -correlational design, with a sample of 25 seventh-grade students in General Basic Education. These students administered the Revised Reading Processes Assessment Battery (PROLEC-R), which measured four processing modules comprising nine subtests. The results showed that approximately 65% of the participants exhibited a level of reading difficulty, with syntactic processes being an area of vulnerability (68%), followed by lexical processing of pseudowords (64%) and letter identification (56–64%). The correlations between dimensions were significant (r = 0.67–0.78; p < 0.001), thus confirming the hierarchical and interdependent nature of reading-related processes. It was concluded that the identified difficulties have an effect on comprehension. Students with difficulties in the phonological route (low performance on pseudowords) would require attention to phonological awareness and grapheme-phoneme correspondences. Those with comprehension difficulties would need to work on vocabulary, prior knowledge, and comprehension strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sisalima Angamarca, K. T., Salguero Espinosa, P. A., & Mejía Marín, A. A. (2026). Reading processes among elementary school students in Quito: an assessment using the PROLEC-R battery. Boletín Científico Ideas Y Voces, 6(2), Pág. 38–47. https://doi.org/10.60100/bciv.v6i2.312
Section
Articles

References

Cayhualla, N., Chilón, D., & Espíritu, R. H. (2013). Adaptación psicométrica de la Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores Revisada (PROLEC-R). Propósitos y Representaciones, 1(1), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2013.v1n1.3

Cieza Altamirano, W. P. (2023). Análisis de la comprensión lectora en la educación. Horizontes. Revista de Investigación en Ciencias de la Educación, 7(31), 2699-2710. https://doi.org/10.33996/revistahorizontes.v7i31.695

Coltheart, M. (2005). Modeling Reading: The Dual-Route Approach. En M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook (pp. 6-23). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch1

Cuetos, F. (2008). Psicología de la lectura (7ª ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Cuetos, F., Rodríguez, B., Ruano, E., & Arribas, D. (2007). PROLEC-R. Batería de Evaluación de los Procesos Lectores, Revisada. TEA Ediciones.

David, C., Costescu, C., Frandeș, A., & Roșan, A. (2024). Cognitive Regulation Strategies Used by Children with Reading Difficulties. Children, 11(3), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11030288

Defior, S., & Serrano, F. (2011). Procesos fonológicos explícitos e implícitos, lectura y dislexia. Neuropsicología, Neuropsiquiatría y Neurociencias, 11(1), 79-94. https://produccioncientifica.ugr.es/documentos/62f465c6d21277524395424a?lang=en

Filippetti, V. A., & López, M. B. (2016). Predictores de la Comprensión Lectora en Niños y Adolescentes: El papel de la Edad, el Sexo y las Funciones Ejecutivas. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 10(1), 23-44. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/4396/439645603003/html/

Flores Macías, R. del C., Jiménez González, J. E., & García Miranda, E. (2015). Adolescentes pobres lectores: Evaluación de procesos cognoscitivos básicos. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 17(2), 34-47. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1607-40412015000200003

Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., Carlisle, J. F., & Mitchell, A. M. (2017). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological knowledge for adolescent readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 91-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12064

Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104

Granda Asencio, L. Y., Ordoñez Ocampos, B. P., & Aguirre Labanda, J. E. (2023). Importancia de la comprensión lectora en las áreas básicas del aprendizaje. Portal de la Ciencia, 4(2), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.51247/pdlc.v4i2.365

Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. (2018). Educación en Ecuador. Resultados de PISA para el Desarrollo. INEVAL.

Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa. (2024). Resultados de la evaluación Ser Estudiante 2022-2023. INEVAL.

Jiménez, J. E., & Hernández-Valle, I. (2000). Word identification and reading disorders in the Spanish language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300108

LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2

Morante, H., & Ramírez, M. (2024). Comprensión lectora y aprendizaje significativo en los estudiantes de Educación Básica Superior. Revista Científica y Académica, 4(1), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.61384/r.c.a..v4i2.207

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook

Nippold, M. A. (2017). Reading Comprehension Deficits in Adolescents: Addressing Underlying Language Abilities. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(2), 125-131. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_LSHSS-16-0048

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. Oxford University Press.

Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. En L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of Functional Literacy (pp. 189-213). John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027296108-swll.11.14per

Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing Reading Fluency. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483166

Salvador Cruz, J., Cuetos Vega, F., & Aguillón Solís, C. (2016). Adaptación cultural y datos normativos del test de lectura PROLEC-R en niños mexicanos de 9 a 12 años. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 10(2), 42-58. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=439677661006

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030

Sukovieff, A., & Kruk, R. S. (2021). Reading difficulty and socio-emotional adjustment: Internalizing patterns depend on age of identification. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1910162. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1910162

Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325040250040801

UNESCO. (2022). Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo (ERCE 2019). Resumen nacional de resultados: Ecuador. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380243