Reduction of carbon emissions with certified timber in construction systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traditional construction, which relies on steel and concrete, is responsible for a significant share of global CO₂ emissions. In contrast, certified wood has emerged as a sustainable alternative, since its production and use leave a much smaller carbon footprint. This material, sourced through responsible forest management practices (endorsed by certifications such as FSC or PEFC), not only captures carbon during the tree’s growth but also requires less energy to process compared to other structural materials. Its integration into construction systems supports a circular economy, as wood is renewable, recyclable, and biodegradable. Research has shown that wooden structures can store tons of CO₂, helping to mitigate environmental impact. Innovative techniques such as laminated timber and CLT (Cross-Laminated Timber) have improved both efficiency and strength, making it possible to construct medium- and high-rise buildings with low emissions. However, challenges persist, including restrictive regulations and limited technical knowledge. Even so, the potential of wood to lower carbon emissions in the construction industry is undeniable. To promote its widespread use, public policies, tax incentives, and professional training are essential measures that would align the sector with global climate goals.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Bribian, I. Z., Capilla, A. V., & Uson, A. A. (2011). Life cycle assessment of building materials: Comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Building and Environment, 46(5), 1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002
Brunet-Navarro, P., Jochheim, H., Muys, B., & San-Miguel-Ayanz, J. (2016). Climate change mitigation through forest sector activities: The potential of European countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.009
Espinoza, O., Buehlmann, U., & Smith, R. L. (2016). Forest certification and green building standards: Overview and use in the U.S. hardwood industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(2), 1946–1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.050
FAO. (2023). The State of the World’s Forests 2022: Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/publications/sofo
Alaofi, M. R., & Gokarakonda, S. (2022). A review on buildings energy information: Trends, end-uses, fuels and drivers. Energy and Buildings, 255, 111657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111657
Gustavsson, L., Sathre, R., & Joelsson, A. (2021). Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy and Buildings, 43(7), 1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.014
Habert, G., Arribe, D., Dehane, D., Espinosa, M., & Lelu, A. (2020). Reducing environmental impact: new trends in building materials. Materials Today: Proceedings, 31, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.631
https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references
Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., & Setunge, S. (2019). Environmental impact and economic assessment of construction and demolition waste in road construction. Sustainability, 11(11), 3004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113004
UNEP. (2022). 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. United Nations Environment Programme. https://globalabc.org
van der Lugt, P., Vogtländer, J., & Brezet, H. (2020). Bamboo: A sustainable solution for Western Europe? Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.031
Van der Lugt, R. F. W. M., van der Vlugt, C. H. M., & van der Linden, A. J. A. (2017). Life cycle assessment of a pre-fabricated timber frame wall compared to a conventional brick wall. Journal of Cleaner Production, 127, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.072
Yates, A., & Bergin, R. (2021). Life cycle assessment of modern methods of construction. BRE Trust Report. https://www.bregroup.com