Peer Assessment in Ecuadorian middle school EFL classrooms: effect on writing, engagement, and motivation Evaluación entre pares en EFL clases en escuela de Ecuador: efecto en escritura, participación y motivación

Contenido principal del artículo

Alejandro Henry Moncayo Triviño
Ninfa Sofía Guevara-Peñaranda

Resumen

The present study investigated the effect of Peer Assessment (PA) on performance, engagement, and motivation among middle school EFL writing students. This mixed-methods design study examined the rate of improvement in writing, measured changes in students’ levels of motivation and engagement, and explored teachers’ perceptions of the PA. The quantitative pre- and post-test data were collected from the control group (n=25) and experimental group (n=67). Moreover, the students of the experimental group filled out a questionnaire evaluating their PA activities as well. Additionally, qualitative data were obtained by interviewing teachers (n=5), who provided their views on the pros and cons of implementing PA in EFL instruction. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and a Paired t-test. The analysis of the qualitative data produced a thematic analysis, and coding was used to highlight repetition. Results demonstrated that the writing scores were significantly higher (M=8.76, p<.01). However, the means of Behavioral Engagement (M=11.11/15) and Emotional Engagement (M=10.83/15) indicated that students are willing to engage in the reviewing of peer assignments. Motivation (M=10.57) showed a possible difficulty of engagement or resistance toward applying PA in the classroom. During and after PA activities, teachers indicated high levels of motivation, confidence, and some improvement in writing skills.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Moncayo Triviño, A. H., & Guevara-Peñaranda, N. S. (2025). Peer Assessment in Ecuadorian middle school EFL classrooms: effect on writing, engagement, and motivation: Evaluación entre pares en EFL clases en escuela de Ecuador: efecto en escritura, participación y motivación. Boletín Científico Ideas Y Voces, 5(3), Pág. 19 – 38. https://doi.org/10.60100/bciv.v5i3.238
Sección
Artículos

Citas

Adesina, O. O., Adesina, O. A., Adelopo, I., & Afrifa, G. A. (2022). Managing group work: the impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education, 32(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2022.2034023

Ahmad, S., Sultana, N., & Jamil, S. (2020). Behaviorism vs constructivism: A paradigm shift from traditional to alternative assessment techniques. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 7(2), 19-33. http://www.jallr.com/~jallrir/index.php/JALLR/article/view/1092

Alqarni, T., & Alshakhi, A. (2021). The Impact of Negotiation as a Social Practice on EFL Writing Peer Assessment Sessions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(10), 1334–1341. https://doi.org/10.17507/TPLS.1110.23

Asper, G., Faria, C., Serra, P., & Galvão, C. (2024). Peer feedback and learning: a case study with 8th-grade Portuguese students. Education 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2364610

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

Cui, J., & Niu, Y. (2024). Effect of peer assessment based cooperative learning on middle school students’ english writing performance. The EUrASEANs : Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 6(49), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.6(49).2024.426-436

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-04680-000

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement. Review of Educational Research. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/00346543074001059

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31-44. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374315000491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002

Hao, H., & Razali, A. B. M. (2022). The Impact of Peer Feedback on Chinese EFL Junior High School Students’ Writing Performance. English Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n9p9

Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2020). Feedback in second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (Eds.). (2019). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://es.scribd.com/document/763131899/Second-Edition-Feedback-in-Second-Language-Writing-Contexts-and-Issues

Jafarigohar, M. (2020). The Effect of Assessment Technique on EFL Learners’ Writing Motivation and Self-Regulation (Research Paper). Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 141-162. https://journalscmu.sinaweb.net/article_120509.html

Kiasi, G. A., & Rezaie, S. (2021). The Effect of Peer Assessment and Collaborative Assessment on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(13), 08-16. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.13.2

Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Lv, L., & Xu, Y. (2020). Peer assessment in the digital age: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(6), 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1702513

Lochmiller, C. R. (2021). Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data. The Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2029-2044. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5008

McCrudden, M. T., Marchand, G., & Schutz, P. A. (2021). Joint displays for mixed methods research in psychology. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100067. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260121000242

Meletiadou, E. (2021). Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Peer Assessment Affect EFL Students’ Writing Quality? Languages, 6(3), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030115

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-04680-000

Ruru, T. A. N., & Sulistyo, T. (2020). Peer review in writing activities: outcomes and perceptions of EFL students. https://doi.org/10.33474/J-REALL.V1I2.6845

Tarihoran, W. A., & Nasution, D. K. (2024). A Probe into the Impact of Teachers Assessment on Students Engagement in EFL Learning : Views From EFL School Teachers. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 6(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v6i2.1841

Topping, K. J. (2017). Peer assessment. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 1(1), 1-17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1302975.pdf

Tunagür, M. (2021). The Effect of Peer Assessment Application on Writing Anxiety and Writing Motivation of 6th Grade Students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(1), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i1.4352

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=803661

Yoon, G., & Kim, H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Process Feedback and Outcome Feedback: Focusing on Peer Feedback Among Middle School Students. 15(3), 461–494. https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2024.06.15.3.15

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a